Partisan election Essay

The enquiry of Lawrence Baum deals with the relationship betwixt the quantity of information that electors possess and their party choose behavior in follower election. The paper aims to discern whether there is each a strong or a weak relationship among voters and the knowledge on the candidates of parties involve in the election. The paper explored the relationship in non-partisan elections contested by candidates from opposing parties.Past studies regarding this relationship has produced mixed and mistake empirical results that motivated the pen to conduct his own depicted object to but explore and analyze the topic. (Baum, 1987) In political science, the structure and functions of regime in a society are greatly scrutinized and evaluated. This is not meant just to better(p) knowledge, but kinda to provide society with enough critical evaluations on how they should treat and consider politics in their life.The issue is crucial as it involves the practice of voting wh ich is considered as one of the freedom citizenry bread and butter in a democratic is entitled to. Thus, the study is relevant in cultivating the showing in political science which concerns the nature of politics in society and society itself. done the effort of the causation to bring hoy into the topic, he analyzed a survey done on devil contestants in the 1984 election for Ohio Supreme Court and compared it with the presidential election to a fault during that year.The findings of the study show that despite the highly partisan campaign, part defections by voters were far more common in Supreme Court races than in the presidential race. (Baum, 1987) This reflects the importance of party affiliations of the candidates as the voters arising of information about the candidates, which will definitely determine their choice during the elections. another(prenominal) not able finding of the paper is that different trains of voters information, at the individual level, has differ ing effect in 2 supreme court races for the Democratic and Republican voters.Through this finding, the former suggests that the impact of the information levels on the voters choice is a blame by the information contained in the candidates campaigns. (Baum, 1987) But the author failed to mention the correlational statistics between voters information about the parties involved in the elections and the result of the elections. What I noticed in the researched was that it also failed to show the full-strength relationship that undermines the effect of information on the voters choice, and whether the popularity of a particular party makes the difference in casting an individual vote.The author notes that the research findings should be critically evaluated and interpreted based on two respects first is that the individual level findings was based to what is believed to be that moderate good surrogates of voters information thus not implying a concrete viable measure of the info rmation itself, and the second world that the Ohio Supreme Court race is far different from the typical bipartisan races in the country. (Baum, 1987)The analysis of the research had totally contributed by attesting to the logic make by previous research, agreeing or disagreeing to some of the conclusions past research had do and was not able to discern the concrete findings to which we can understand better what the relationship of information on the parties to the candidates, and also in the outcome of the elections. The author admits that the study was not able to settle the issue, rather have suggested only the relationship that is based on a complex and highly qualified situation.With that, the research has contributed only a partial explanation and findings that what was expected from it. Although the study answered the research question directly, it failed to deliver the aspects which concerns to the findings. The paper evaluated the problem by analyzing the issues that s urrounds the partisan election during the 1984 Ohio Supreme Court elections. The author analyzed the individual level survey done by Ohio State University Department of Political Science.The call off interviews of 500 adults in Ohio were done through questions that relate voters information of the parties and their choices of the candidates. The research method through the survey was not able to reach the individual level of perspective of the interviewees, but as the author states, provided logical background on the perception of the voters. This in turn was be by the author as a means that moderately concerned the individual perspective and does not reflect the core of the relationship between information of the party and voters choice.The research only relied on second hand information provided by only one luminary institution. Given the exploration of the research aspect in political science, I deem that this method used by Baum was not enough and satisfactory to analyze th e said complexities of the relationship between party information and voters choice. But the author should be credited for his thorough raillery of the issues surrounding his research method. In this way, he was able to prove that the complexness of the subject must be dealt with an on-going process of research and analysis rather than claiming that he has the answer.As mentioned earlier, political science is a pursuit to understand the complexities of politics and its function in the society. It is an undergoing process to accumulate much and gain ground enrichment of knowledge based on the state of politics and our everyday living. It is literal after all, the author had concluded significantly that the relationship is there, although the complexities and challenges in firmness of purpose the issues are evident. The research was intended to explore the issue, not just give away the answer to the problem right away.The research was able to do this in effect and the author is humble and honest enough to relate all the things that should be rethought, re-evaluated and analyzed by the reader. One of the roles political science has is to inform and educate society of the complexities of politics, and how the function of politics in society will affect the way they live, think and behave. The research accomplished the goal of educating and exploring further the realm of politics which is known in the society.But further challenging the multiplication of political scientist, observant, and the society in general to further study the count and contribute to the increasing knowledge in the area of political science. To this, people are learned, cultured, and are equipped with the knowledge on how to view politics in society so they can make informed and refreshing choices. Reference Baum, L. (1987). Information and Party Voting in Semipartisan Judicial Elections. Poltical Behavior, 9(1), 62-74.